The Big EHR Question: What Does “Meaningful Use” Mean?

71897561By Helen Oscislawski, Esq.

It has been a year since the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (also known as “the stimulus bill” or “ARRA”) was enacted on February 17, 2009.  ARRA contains many measures to “modernize” the nation’s infrastructure, including the health care delivery system.  Between August and December 2009, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) within the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) announced several new programs and allocated more than a billion dollars of federal funds specifically toward laying the groundwork for a nation-wide advanced electronic health information system.  One such program establishes incentive payments to eligible professionals (EPs) and eligible hospitals to help promote the adoption and “Meaningful Use” of interoperable health information technology (HIT) and a qualified electronic health record (EHR).  These incentive payments are part of a broader effort under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) to accelerate the adoption of HIT and utilization of qualified EHRs.

With promises of potentially up to an additional maximum of forty four thousand dollars ($44,000) over five years in Medicare incentive payments or sixty-five thousand dollars ($65,000) in Medicaid incentive payments per eligible physician using a qualified EHR, further guidance from the federal government on how exactly a physician can qualify for these stimulus funds is highly anticipated.  Thus, the $44,000 and $65,000-dollar question continually being asked is: “What does ‘Meaningful Use’ mean?”

Multiple federal agencies and advisory bodies have been working together towards defining Meaningful Use.  The HIT Policy Committee convened meetings over the summer to begin vetting the issue, and after a rework of its first draft, the Meaningful Use workgroup released the “Final Meaningful Use Objectives and Measures 2011-2013-2015” document on August 14, 2009.  The HIT Standards Committee then followed by releasing its recommendations on August 20, 2009 regarding Measures Data Elements, Clinical Operations, and Privacy and Security.  The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics also added its observations on Meaningful Use of HIT after holding a hearing on the topic on May 18, 2009. Finally, on December 30, 2009, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the  Proposed Rule for “Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program” (see 42 C.F.R. Part 412, et al. (January 13, 2010)), which is referred to hereafter as the “EHR-Incentive Rule.”  At the same time, ONC released its Interim Final Rule for “Health Information Technology: Initial Set of Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology.”  See 45 C.F.R. Part 170.

Under the EHR-Incentive Rule, for purposes of Medicare payments an “Eligible Professional”  is a doctor of medicine or osteopathy, a doctor of dental surgery or dental medicine, a doctor of podiatric medicine, a doctor of optometry, or a chiropractor, who is legally authorized to practice under state law who is able to demonstrate Meaningful Use for the EHR reporting period.  For Medicaid payments, an “Eligible Professional” includes physicians, pediatricians, dentists, certified nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) or rural health clinic (RHC) led by a physician assistant.  “Hospital-based” professionals (e.g., anesthesiologists; emergency room physicians etc.) who furnish substantially all their services in a “hospital setting” are not eligible for incentive payments (except for those practicing in a FQHC or RHC).  The EHR-Incentive Rule proposes that a hospital-based Eligible Professional be defined as one who furnishes ninety percent (90%) or more of his/her allowed services in a hospital, including all hospital inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department settings.

An Eligible Professional who qualifies for Medicare or Medicaid incentive payments through Meaningful Use of a certified EHR system can potentially receive up to five years of incentive payments, with the earliest payment to be made some time in 2011 (each, a “Payment Year”).   A Payment Year equals a calendar year, and incentive payments for Meaningful Use begin as early as 2011 and end after 2016 (for Medicare) or 2020 (for Medicaid).  In general, a qualifying Eligible Professional can receive Medicare incentive payments that total as much as $18,000 if his or her first Payment Year is 2011 or 2012.  Thereafter, the annual incentive payment limits in the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth years are $15,000, $12,000, $8,000, $4000, and $2,000 respectively.  In general, the maximum amount of total incentive payments that an Eligible Professional can receive under the Medicare program is $44,000. The Medicaid incentive payments include a slightly higher potential first year payment (e.g., $25,000), however an Eligible Professional’s ability to obtain such payments may be limited by his or her respective state’s preparedness for processing Medicaid payments for Meaningful Use.

The EHR Incentive Rule includes numerous criteria, both clinical (e.g,. CPOE) and non-clinical (e.g., ensuring privacy and security), for achieving “Meaningful Use”.  All the required criteria must be met to qualify for incentive payments.  The government has indicated that the EHR-Incentive Rule would phase in more robust criteria for demonstrating Meaningful Use in three (3) stages.

For Stage 1, the government proposes that criteria for Meaningful Use focuses on electronically capturing health information in a coded format, using that information to track key clinical conditions, communicating that information for care coordination purposes, and initiating the reporting of clinical quality measures and public health information.  The EHR-Incentive Rule proposes Meaningful Use criteria based on a series of specific objectives, each of which is tied to a proposed measure that all Eligible Professionals must meet in order to demonstrate that they are Meaningful Users of certified EHR technology.  Initially, twenty-five (25) objectives/measures for Eligible Professionals must be met.  All of the results for all objectives/measures, including clinical quality measures would be reported by Eligible Professionals to CMS, or for Medicaid Eligible Professionals to their respective states, through attestation. By 2012, the federal government proposes the direct submission of clinical quality measures to CMS (or to the states for Medicaid) through certified EHR technology.  The federal government indicates that by using certified EHR technology to report information on clinical quality measures electronically directly to a health information network, a state, CMS, or a registry, the burden on providers that are gathering the data and transmitting them should be greatly reduced.

After Stage 1, CMS intends to propose through future rulemaking two additional stages that would expand upon the criteria for Meaningful Use identified in Stage 1. Disease management, clinical decision support, medication management, support for patient access to their health information, transitions in care, quality measurement and research, and bi-directional communication with public health agencies are identified as aspects of Meaningful Use to be expanded upon in Stage 2.  Finally, in Stage 3, the government indicates it will focus on achieving improvements in quality, safety and efficiency, focusing on decision support for national high priority conditions, patient access to self management tools, access to comprehensive patient data, and improving population health outcomes.

Reporting will be a key aspect of Meaningful Use.  For the first year an Eligible Professional applies for and receives an incentive payment, the EHR-Incentive Rule proposes a ninety (90) day reporting period for any continuous period beginning and ending within the year.  For every year after the first incentive payment year, the EHR-Incentive Rule proposes that the EHR reporting period is the entire year.

Debate (and criticism) over the EHR-Incentive Rule and Meaningful Use continues, and revisions to the EHR-Incentive Rule are more than certain.  CMS is accepting comments to the rule through March 15, 2010.  Until then, the best that providers and others trying to prepare for complying with Meaningful Use is remain as flexible as possible to meet the evolving Meaningful Use criteria.

Helen Oscislawski is an attorney with Fox Rothschild and can be reached at 609.895.3310 or hoscislawski@foxrothschild.com.

5 comments

  1. incentiving and encouraging physicians to purchase ehr/emr is the first step to centralizing american health records by the feds. the second step will be, through federal legislation, data collection. the third, and likely crucial step for the feds, is to begin advising and telling physicians how, what and why to treat patients based upon statistical success rates. the patient / physician relationship will be non-existant!

  2. I’m puzzled by two things:
    1. How can a chiropractor be listed among the “eligible professionals” for Medicare incentives *and* be virtually prevented from establishing “meaningful use?” Chiropractors do not practice in some of the 25 EHR modules, specifically, in e-prescribing and labs.
    2. Providers have been consistently hit with reimbursement reductions and skyrocketing overhead due to increasing regulations. Still, even modest process improvement in-house could recover potentially tens of thousands per year per provider. Doesn’t this dampen the allure of something up to or short of 44,000 over six years (one to prepare and five to report and possibly receive payments)?

  3. Of course there is more to it than installing systems. Let’s face it, computers play an extremely important role in today’s world; no matter what you do. There will be far less medication errors, order errors, and better documentation. And, is it really that wrong for a physician to have a clean and safe environment to operate? I should say not.

  4. Federal funding may be encouraging a move toward EHR, but there’s more to it than just installing systems.

  5. A recent incident in Haiti where two physicians delayed amputation of a limb on a small child because they could find no hospital in which to do the amputation and ultimately lost the patient, gives you a good example of the mind set you are creating among the American trained physicians, i.e., must have the proper setting, proper instruments, all the backup to protect themselves from possible lawsuits and government criticism before proceeding with patient care. Our physicians are no longer taking care of the patient in front of him, but worrying about the “Big Brothers” standing behind him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.