Home / News Briefs / Live From DC….It's The Health Reform Summit

Live From DC….It's The Health Reform Summit

“I don’t know that these gaps can be bridged.”  That quote by President Obama succinctly sums up the political theatre production of the Health Reform Summit, which yesterday played live for a nationally televised audience.

The Summit was billed as a bi-partisan effort to resuscitate health reform legislation.  But it was more cynically anticipated to be a show produced by the Obama administration to force passage of a Democratic-produced bill temporarily stalled by Republicans.  Basically, political theatre.

In his opening remarks at The Summit, Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Ten.) listed several ideas vital to successful reform that were, to date, left out of the proposed bills.  Tort reform, Alexander said, would “put an end to junk lawsuits against doctors. In our state half the counties, pregnant women have to drive to the big city to have prenatal health care or to have their baby because the medical malpractice suits have driven up the insurance policies so high that doctors leave the rural counties.”

We welcome all opinions here and would gladly print views opposing tort reform.  However, we don’t get them.  It’s hard to argue against an idea that, according to the Congressional Budget Office, “would lower costs for health care both directly, by reducing medical malpractice costs—which consist of malpractice insurance premiums and settlements, awards, and legal and administrative costs not covered by insurance—and indirectly, by reducing the use of health care services through changes in the practice patterns of providers.”  Tort reform, according to the CBO, “would reduce federal budget deficits by about $54 billion during the 2010–2019 period.”

Back at The Summit, Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), challenged Sen. Alexander by suggesting “You are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.”  Reid said Republicans have a right to oppose the current legislation, but they also have a responsibility to “propose ideas for making it better.”  This comment was made after Alexander proposed his ideas for making it better, which further cemented this production as a live, talking point show.

Let us know your thoughts on The Summit….

3 comments

  1. Today’s medical professional liability system is too adversarial and too expensive. There are alternatives.

    Jeremy
    Healthcare Town Hall

  2. RE: Tort Reform

    What is needed is a court venue that uses scientific probability, not civil probability, to determine causality.

    If causality has been scientifically proven then liability, if any, should be based on certified life care planning; if applicable, including mental health care and chronic pain management (as opposed to the current day “pain and suffering” awards).

    Once certified life care plan determined then the judgment should be placed in a trust so that the funds are spent as determined.

  3. IF THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES WANT AN ECONOMICALLY VIABLE AND ETHICALLY REALISTIC HEALTH CARE SYSTEM THEN WE ARE GOING TO HAVE TO:

    #1) MAKE THE POLITICAL LEADERS WALK THE TALK- THEY MUST HAVE THE SAME BENEFITS THAT THEY ARE FORCING UPON THE GENERAL POPULATION,

    #2) ALLOW ALL U.S. CITIZENS AND U.S. TAX PAYING LEGAL RESIDENTS TO HAVE A HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT,

    #3) ALLOW ALL U.S. CITIZENS AND U.S. TAX PAYING LEGAL RESIDENTS TO GET A TAX DEDUCTION/CREDIT FOR THE PREMIUM OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE OF THEIR CHOICE,

    #4) ALLOW ALL U.S. HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS TO GET A TAX DEDUCTION/CREDIT FOR THE CHARITY HEALTH CARE THEY PROVIDE IN THE U.S., ITS AIRSPACE OR TERRITORIAL WATERS AND

    #5) HAVE TRUTH IN PRICING- I.E. TELL THE CUSTOMER, THE PATIENT, THE ACTUAL COSTS OF GOODS AND SERVICES PRIOR TO PURCHASE IN NON EMERGENT SITUATIONS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.